Archive for June 21st, 2011

June 21, 2011

6/21 – Dalton Daily Citizen – A ‘love-hate’ relationship

A ‘love-hate’ relationship » Local News » The Daily Citizen, Dalton, GA.

June 21, 2011

Latinos fear ‘chaos’ with implementation of new law

DALTON — Raquel Uribe has applied for legal papers so her husband — who is not a U.S. citizen — can drive to work without fear of getting pulled over and taken to jail.

But will they arrive soon enough?

“What happens to my husband if he does not have the papers just yet?” she asked in advance of House Bill 87 — Georgia’s new immigration law — being implemented starting on July 1. “I’m concerned that (police) officers are not properly trained to determine who is documented and who is not. There are many different types of status. The officers won’t know who or who is not to be detained.”

Uribe was one of more than a dozen students learning English in a class on the east side of town Saturday afternoon. Some expressed concerns about being separated from their children if detained — and possibly deported. Others wondered what will happen if they — as legal citizens — are pulled over while unknowingly giving a ride to someone without documentation.

Will they be arrested also?

“I’ve been here 12 years in Dalton, this is my home now,” said Aradio Mendez. “But I’m concerned that (the authorities) will punish us not just because of traffic offenses, but for transporting relatives who may be here illegally just for now.”

But Police Chief Jason Parker said Dalton is ahead of the curve when it comes to immigration enforcement because of the 287(g) program — a joint venture between the Whitfield County Sheriff’s Office and the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) — that helps authorities identify “criminal aliens” who could be deported.

“As I understand the new law, I don’t think we’ll be doing anything different from an operational standpoint,” he said. “We currently do have the ability to check on somebody’s status if they’re involved in a crime. We don’t do that very often for several reasons. First of all, the sheriff’s office has 287(g) in place already, so our understanding is that anyone we arrest — which means they’ve committed a crime of some kind — the jail personnel check their status when they go in.”

Parker also said detectives “use ICE resources” in the course of their investigations.

“When the sun comes up on July 1, we’ll still be taking care of business in the same way that we have, and that is according to what the Constitution allows and what our strategic plan is, and we really don’t plan to change that. We feel like we’re being fair with the public and we feel like we’re enforcing the law fairly,” he said.

But a physician who has been here for years says a “humanitarian crisis” has erupted in the Latino community because of rumors spinning out about the new law.

“I can tell you that people are scared, they’re afraid (and) suffering traumatic stress over it,” said Dr. Pablo Perez, a native of Peru who has been in the U.S. since 1992 and in Dalton for 12 years. “From a medical point of view, I can tell you that people who have anxiety or mood disorders are suffering exacerbations of those problems. It’s affecting the entire Latino community, not only legal or illegal — but minorities such as Asians and other people of color. And it’s because of (HB 87), how it’s been proposed. People feel like it’s not fair and is dividing the community. We see people coming (into the clinic) and crying because one of the family members has been separated.

“Kids are afraid they’ll come home from school and not find their parents at home.”

Perez, who has been a U.S. citizen for five years, added, “There is a lot of chaos. I can tell you (it’s) a humanitarian crisis. It’s not exaggerated, it’s something real … it’s a collective hysteria, a panic that people are developing even when there is not something concrete going on. The rumors scare the people, and the rumors make them leave.”
Dispelling rumors

Several meetings around town organized by Hispanic leaders have attempted to dispel rumors about the law in the Latino community. One such meeting took place at St. Joseph’s Medical Clinic, where Perez practices.

“Most of the concerns were about people’s rights,” said Carlos Calderin of Calderin and Oliva, a law firm specializing in immigration rights, which directed the meeting of around three dozen Latinos. “One of the biggest concerns was what happens to a U.S. citizen who is driving around and has people in the car — and that it somehow comes out that those people are undocumented. And so, one of the things we tried to explain was that … if you’re just giving someone a ride that’s undocumented and the person gets arrested (for giving them a ride) — that just doesn’t happen. We tried to explain the fact that there needs to be an independent crime being committed, and too, that the driver must have known and intended to transport illegal aliens. And so we talked about the fact that you may suspect that somebody is undocumented but sometimes we don’t know if they are or not — like a car pool. You have to have known they didn’t have papers.”

Calderin said another concern is whether police will be out in force arresting people during roadblocks, or just walking around and asking people for legal status papers.

“That’s a typical concern that people have that was clarified,” he said.

Parker believes traffic stops are conducted in “a fair way.”

“Road checks are conducted on a city-wide basis, we try to cover all areas of the city so we can ensure we’ll be as fair as we possibly can,” he said. “Now, let’s just say somebody lives in a neighborhood. Do they only drive in that neighborhood? No, they drive all over town because the resources — the stores and so forth — are spread throughout (the city). So I think you’d have difficulty in saying there is a Hispanic neighborhood anymore or a Hispanic ‘location’ anymore. It’s no more than you could say there’s a Caucasian-only section of town because people have assimilated, they’ve bought property … and people live everywhere.”

Working toward a bilingual force

Police Officer Federico Nietzche of the Dalton Police Department grew up in Dalton and graduated from Southeast High School in 1999. He said when news of House Bill 87 hit the Hispanic community through radio shows and the Internet, there was an “initial shock.”

“It was like, ‘Oh, my God, they’re passing a big immigration law that’s going to run everybody out,’” said Nietzche, a four-year Latino member of the Dalton force who followed in his grandfather’s steps and became a policeman. “There was a lot of talk about what we would do (as a law enforcement agency), whether we’d be going down the road asking people for their papers. The answer is no. It won’t affect the average citizen walking downtown.”

He said a “concern” he’s picked up on from the Hispanic community as a patrol officer is that law enforcement officers would become “immigration officers” starting July 1.

“That’s all they were concerned about,” Nietzche said, “thinking, ‘Are you going to be able to arrest anyone who’s illegal?’”

Parker said the force has five bilingual officers and others have been trained in the Spanish language.

“We couldn’t say that our entire force is fluent, by any means, but we can say we have the only agency in the state that requires and provides for officers to receive training in the Spanish language,” he said. “The reason for that is that we realize half of the population we serve is of Hispanic ethnicity or an ethnic group that does not speak English.”

Nietzche said his understanding of the new law is that it gives officers “authority” to ask for immigration status if a person is breaking the law or attempting to give false information.

“The new law is giving us more tools in the bag to use,” he said. “The average citizen has nothing to worry about, but it gives us another tool to deal with people who are breaking the law or who are involved in something suspicious.”

Police spokesman Bruce Frazier said there is “one thing” the law doesn’t change.

“We still have to have probable cause to investigate someone,” he said. “It has to be probable cause for anything in a law enforcement situation, because we know we can be challenged in court on that.”
Racial profiling?

Still, Perez said misinformation is causing “a lot of division and issues of fear and insecurity.”

“The chief of police has a perception that we need to have a safe community, a safe environment — and they are not attacking the Latino community,” he said. “But unfortunately, there are some other things that could be out of his hands that could be an abuse of authority. It could be that this law (allows) some officers to commit racial profiling or to have certain types of activities that are not constitutional … it’s a very complex, sensitive issue that we need to address in our community from different perspectives.”

Parker said rights are an area “we pay close attention to.”

“We feel like we’ve been very careful about guarding against institutional things creeping up where there appears to be some sort of constitutional problem in the way that citizens are being treated by the officers,” he said.

Parker was asked if there have been interactions with the Hispanic community at a leadership level.

“We’ve made some attempts in the past to do that, and I would describe our results as moderately successful,” he said. “It’s difficult to identify sometimes who are the — quote, unquote — leaders of a particular group. We would prefer to deal with citizens on a one-on-one basis and hear their concerns, because we’re more likely to hear the unvarnished information straight from them, about what their particular concern is. I think it would be difficult for one advocacy group or another to say that they represent all people of that ethnicity — when that’s almost one-half of the city’s population.”

But Parker said there has been no “hue and cry” from any ethnic groups to the police department in advance of the law’s implementation.

“In the last couple of weeks … (we’ve) not heard complaints from advocacy groups or others who have taken a position that they represent Hispanic groups,” he reported. “So I’m concerned that, in conjunction with House Bill 87, that all of a sudden there’s now this new concern. So I would ask where was this concern prior to that? We’ve been here all the time. And our officers, I feel like, know the community fairly well.”

Nietzche was asked if the law is putting a strain on relations between the department and the Hispanic community.

“So far I don’t see it, probably because it hasn’t been implemented,” he said. “There’s been a love-hate relationship from the Latino community, but it has nothing to do with immigration. There’s a group that will not call the police no matter what, and other citizens who will. It’s either black or white with no gray areas. The Hispanic community doesn’t want to give (white officers) a chance, though. We have some Anglo officers who can speak Spanish well, but when I get on the scene (Latinos) ‘open up’ when I get there.”

Frazier said some of the negative perceptions of the police there may originate from other areas of the country.

“It may come from places where there’s a distrust of the police,” he said. “One of the things we’ve tried to do is get the message out — you can call the police and make reports. We don’t want people to become victims without a voice.”
A ‘gut feeling’

Still, Perez has his concerns.

“The more information by qualified people who can tell about the reality of the law, how it’s going to be implemented, is helpful to reassure the community that it’s not as bad as they think,” he agreed. “But the intentions of the law actually is to intimidate, there’s no question about that.”

He said it could also impact him personally, even though he is a U.S. citizen — and perhaps endanger the life of a patient.

“I am concerned that I may be stopped on the way to the hospital (to see a patient) and be told, ‘Show me your papers,’ and be detained to have to show my immigration status,” he said. “So I’m going to carry my passport with me all the time. So it’s going to affect people — from Belgium, from Europe, from Germany at the Volkswagen plant (in Chattanooga) — having houses here. Nobody sees this law in a good way … there are students who are coming here. We are trying to be an international community, but when they see the environment I think they would be unwise to invite somebody to come and take part in the different activities here.”

Perez said most Latinos “are not criminals.”

“They are people who are trying to make a better living here, and are quite supportive to our economy — and it is why we should give them a hand,” he said. “I am concerned about lawsuits against the city, against the police if they conduct things in a way that is not constitutional.”

But as a police officer, Nietzche looks at the law differently.

“It will help back up that gut feeling you have about someone,” he said. “In the course of an investigation, the law gives you a list of credible documents you can ask for. If there are no documents, you can use any available resources to determine who they are. (The law) gives us more tools.”

June 21, 2011

6/13 – GLAHR – Press Release for July 1st, 2nd

See also:

In English and Spanish:

Text Only version of Press Release follows in English and Spanish:

—————————————–
For Immediate Release

Contact: 770 457 5232

June 13th, 2011

GLAHR Calls for Day of Non-Compliance and Protest March
on the Days of HB 87 Implementation.

WHAT:

The Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights (GLAHR) calls on the Latino community and all Georgians of good will, to join us in protest against the new anti-immigrant law HB 87.

WHEN:

July 1, the day the law goes into effect, will be a State-wide Day of Non-Compliance: community members will not work, buy, sell nor spend.

July 2, a massive march for human dignity and immigrant rights against HB 87 will be held in downtown Atlanta

WHERE:

On July 2nd the march will depart from the Capitol Building at 11:00 am and arrive back at Capitol Building at approximately 12:00pm.

“The message is clear: Georgia is no longer the Peach State, it is now the hate state,” said Adelina Nicholls, Executive Director of GLAHR.

Thousands will march in downtown Georgia demonstrating their outrage at the anti-immigrant law and asserting their right to remain. GLAHR is spearheading a multi-faceted campaign to turn back Hate Bill 87 that includes a lawsuit, economic protests like the Day of Non Compliance, marches and rallies, and community organizing and education. “We will show our economic power by not working or shopping on July 1st and will demonstrate our people power by marching July 2nd. Those who thought this law would break apart our
communities have awakened a movement” as Paulina Hernández from SONG states.

Teodoro Maus, president of GLAHR, declared that, “We are asking all people of good will, no matter their race, religion or what they do for a living, to join us in this protest. “Any time that one person is branded
“illegal,” it demeans the dignity of all human beings.”

“GLAHR is going to wage a relentless fight,” Maus said, “not just until we overcome HB 87 and the hate and hysteria that inspired it, but until we get a comprehensive and generous immigration reform from the federal government.”

###

2215 Perimeter Park Dr Suite #6 Ph: 770 457 5232 – Fx 678 325 6747 http://www.glahr.org info@glahr.org

——————————————————–
Para su publicación inmediata:

Contacto: 770 457 5232

Junio 13th, 2011

GLAHR hace un llamado por el Día del Incumplimiento y
Marcha de Protesta en los días que entraría en efecto la HB 87

WHAT:

La Alianza Latina de Georgia por los Derechos Humanos (GLAHR) hace un llamado a la comunidad Latina y a todos los personas de conciencia, a que se unan a la protesta en contra de la nueva ley anti-inmigrante HB87.

WHEN:

July 1o., Día en que la ley entrará en efecto, se llevará a cabo el „Día del
Incumplimiento en el Estado de Georgia: miembros de la comunidad no trabajarán, comprarán, venderán o gastarán.

July 2do, una marcha masiva por la dignidad y derechos de los inmigrantes en contra de la HB87 se llevará cabo en el Centro de Atlanta.

WHERE:

El día 2 de Julio la marcha se iniciará enfrente del Edificio del Capitolio a las 11:00 am y el contingente estará de regreso aproximadamente a las 12:00 pm, para así dar inicio al programa del día.

“El mensaje es claro: Georgia no es más el „Estado Durazno´, ahora es el Estado del Odio”, dijo Adelina Nicholls, Directora Ejecutiva de GLAHR.

Miles marcharán en el centro de Georgia demostrando su protesta ante la ley anti-inmigrante y confirmando el derecho a permanecer. GLAHR está impulsando una campaña multifacética para revocar la HB87 en donde se incluye una demanda, protestas económicas como el “Día del Incumplimiento”, marchas, concentraciones, y organización comunitaria y educativa. “Mostraremos nuestro poder económico a través de NO comprar el día Primero de Julio y demostraremos el poder de la gente marchando el día 2 de Julio. Para aquellos que pensaron que esta ley dividiría nuestras comunidades han despertado un movimiento” como
Paulina Hernández de SONG afirma.

Teodoro Maus, presidente de GLAHR, declaró que, “Estamos llamando a las personas de conciencia, sin importar su raza, religión, o actividad laboral, a unirse en esta protesta. En el momento que una persona es
„etiquetada‟ como „ilegal, demerita su dignidad como ser humano”.

“GLAHR presentará una incansable lucha” Teodoro Maus afirmó, “no sólo hasta que revoquemos la HB 87 y el odio y la histeria que ha inspirado, pero sino hasta que logremos una reforma migratoria, comprensiva y generosa del gobierno federal”.

###

2215 Perimter Park Dr Suite #6 Ph: 770 457 5232 – Fx 678 325 6747 http://www.glahr.org info@glahr.org

————————–

June 21, 2011

6/16 – ajc.com – Some immigration reform legally right, but morally wrong  | ajc.com

Some immigration reform legally right, but morally wrong  | ajc.com.

Opinion 7:05 p.m. Thursday, June 16, 2011

Natalia Elzaurdia — Nati to her friends — is 19, pregnant and scared. She is not scared because she is pregnant, however. She is scared because she is in jail and about to be deported from the only country she has ever really known — the United States of America.

Nati’s situation puts a human face on the collateral damage caused by legislative response to the alleged “immigration crisis.”

To those who say “What is it you don’t get about illegal immigration?” I answer that the issue is not as clear and simple as we would like it to be; at least, not if the average American has any understanding of moral rectitude.

You see, not every illegal immigrant in the United States has willingly or intentionally broken immigration law. There are very many who were brought here when they were children, having no say in — or even an understanding of — what was happening.

When Nati came, she was just 7. As with many others, Nati’s parents, legally admitted with temporary work visas, did not leave the country when their visas expired.

Since federal law asserts a child’s right to education regardless of their immigration status and since Georgia state law upholds that right, Nati proceeded through the American k-12 education system, and for a long time believed she was as American as the next child in the classroom. Why wouldn’t she?

And here’s the odd thing: The premise for Georgia’s compliance with the right-to-education ruling is that children are not responsible for their parents’ decision to enter the country illegally; therefore, they should not be punished for it by having their education withheld.

The problem for people like Nati arises when they turn 18. Overnight they become adults, and suddenly become personally responsible for their parents’ earlier wrong decision. Overnight, they go from being carefree teenagers to people haunted by the ever-present specter of arrest and deportation.

What is a young person in this situation supposed to do? Do they “out” themselves with the likely consequence of forced repatriation to a culture they know little or nothing about, a country that speaks a language with which they may be totally unfamiliar?

Or do they keep the secret, in constant fear of being discovered, living ever after in the shadow of the threat that the very fabric of their lives may be destroyed through one false move?

Nati lived under that threat, and the threat became a reality when she was stopped one evening because a headlight of the car she was driving was out. She gave a false name, hoping to conceal her status. The next thing she knew, she was in jail. Then, she was interviewed by immigration authorities — a direct result of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 287(g) — and then told she would be deported.

So long as Nati’s parents keep a low profile and remain “invisible” to the immigration authorities, they will get to remain in the U.S.

She, however, soon will be separated from them and from the father of her unborn child. She will be sent to a country she has no real memory of. Legally educated in American society and socially acculturated to American values, she will be forced into a world that is foreign to her.

In terms of immigration status, she is the innocent one, and yet she inherits the consequences of her parents’ bad decision.

HB 87 will make this situation worse. Not only will the sons and daughters of illegal immigrants become culpable on their 18th birthdays, the entire law is written to make their continued presence in the U.S. impossible.

History has seen what happens when laws bypass moral standards for political ends. Nazi Germany passed laws making it legal to persecute Jews; South Africa legalized apartheid; and the Southern states passed Jim Crow laws.

Yes, we need immigration laws — but they need to be carefully crafted and subsequently enforced in a way that what is legally right is not bought at the cost of a moral wrong.

Repatriating Nati is legally right but surely morally wrong. It is also cruel, if not, unfortunately, unusual. She did not commit the crime of illegal entry; neither she nor her unborn child nor yet the child’s father should be punished for it.

Steve deClaissé-Walford of Grayson is a pastor and adjunct professor of philosophy and religion at Mercer and Shorter universities.

June 21, 2011

6/20 – WABE(AUDIO) – Federal zeros in on intent of Georgia’s illegal immigration law 2011-06-21

WABE: Federal zeros in on intent of Georgia’s illegal immigration law 2011-06-21.

Shomial Ahmad (2011-06-21)

Listen Now: (go to: http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wabe/news.newsmain/article/1/0/1817908/Atlanta./Federal.zeros.in.on.intent.of.Georgia%27s.illegal.immigration.law )

ACLU Attorney Omar Jadwat talking to reporters after the federal court hearing. Credit: Shomial Ahmad
ATLANTA, GA (WABE) – State and civil liberties groups argued for and against parts of Georgia’s immigration law yesterday. The federal court judge’s questioning zeroed in on the primary purpose of Georgia’s law.

Immigrant advocates characterize Georgia’s immigration law as a copycat law to Arizona, because it gives increased power to local law enforcement in immigration matters. But unlike the Arizona statute, the Georgia law does not have an explicitly defined intent. Arizona’s law clearly states its intent: to decrease the number of illegal immigrants in the state.

Federal court judge Thomas Thrash tried to determine a purpose for the Georgia law. He asked Devon Orland, representing the state, if the purpose is to drive illegal immigrants out of Georgia or make sure they don’t come in the first place.

Orland continually responded that the law’s purpose was to save state resources, millions in health care and jailing costs.

Under repeated questioning, eventually, Orland said if immigrants are here illegally, they need to go soon.

Afterwards, D.A. King, a strong supporter of the bill, expressed dismay at the focus of the judge’s questioning.

“I hope that the purpose of the law is intended to protect all of our citizens and immigrants. And if illegal aliens leave because we’ve made life very difficult for them in Georgia, all the better.”

But Omar Jadwat, an ACLU attorney arguing the case, sees the law punishing more than illegal immigrants.

“I think the purpose of the law is to scapegoat and target both people who are here without status and their family members and their friends, and their neighbors. And again, it’s really not Georgia’s decision to make.”

Thrash says he intends to deliver a ruling on the case before July 1st.

Shomial Ahmad, WABE News.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 75 other followers

%d bloggers like this: