Archive for April 21st, 2011

April 21, 2011

4/21 – Talk Radio News Service – Arizona’s Immigration Law Failing To Catch On – News – Talk Radio News Service: News, Politics, Media

Arizona’s Immigration Law Failing To Catch On – News – Talk Radio News Service: News, Politics, Media.

By Mario Trujillo

Nearly a year after Arizona passed its controversial immigration law, 31 states have proposed similar legislation, 19 have voted it down and only one has enacted a law.

Janet Murguia, the President and CEO of the National Concil of La Raza, said the law has lost traction in other states due to severe tourism and convention revenue losses that come from controversial immigration legislation. Her organization released a report this week that estimates $750 million in revenue has been lost in Arizona since the law was adopted nearly a year ago. Those figures come from a study conducted by the liberal leaning Center For American Progress.

“The costs of political gambits and false solutions, such as SB 1070 [the Arizona law], are too high, especially in times of economic crisis,” Murguia said. 

Utah is the only other state to enact similar legislation — Georgia passed legislation that is awaiting the Governor’s signature — that permits local law enforcement to check immigration papers of those suspected of crimes.

Utah’s law is described as a subdued version of the Arizona Law. It would only require review of immigration documents for people who commit severe misdemeanors and felonies, which is still a stretch, said Salt Lake City Chief of Police Chris Burbank.

“Putting local law enforcement in a position of acting as an immigration agent drives a wedge between the community,” Burbank said. 

The Department of Justice intervened in the Arizona law, preventing it from taking effect. Last week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower courts decision that the law overstepped its bounds in an area that is regulated by the federal government. No action has been taken in Utah’s law, which wouldn’t take effect until 2013.

Executive Director of the National Immigration Law Center Marielena Hincapie said the same arguments against the Arizona Law apply to Utah and her organization is looking into litigation.

“We don’t know where the Administration is at,” Hincapie said. “But we do believe that, as they did in Arizona, they should also be filing suite in Utah and if Georgia becomes law.”

April 21, 2011

4/21 – Mundo Hispánico – Legislador hispano pide a gobernador vetar medida antiinmigrante

Jueves, Abril 21, 2011

El puertorriqueño Pedro Marín, miembro de la Cámara de Representantes de Georgia, hizo un llamado al gobernador Nathan Deal para que vete la propuesta HB87, considerada réplica de la ley antiinmigrante de Arizona.

Marín, quien representa al Distrito 96 ante el Congreso estatal, envió esta semana una carta a Deal pidiéndole formalmente que rechace la iniciativa, aprobada recientemente en la Legislatura.

En la misiva, el legislador demócrata advirte a Deal que la HB87 causaría un daño a la economía del estado, ante inminentes demandas y boicots.

Según Marin, la medida además de afectar al sector agrícola y otras importantes industrias, también generaría perfil racial.

La HB87 contiene cláusulas que permitirían a los policías locales arrestar a cualquier persona que consideren se encuentra ilegal en EE.UU. y obligaría a las empresas a verificar el estatus migratorio de sus empleados, entre otras.

“Georgia es mucho mejor que esto”, recalcó Marin en el escrito. “Por favor vete la HB87”.

April 21, 2011

4/21 – Gwinnett Daily Post – Marin urges governor to veto immigration legislation

Marin urges governor to veto immigration legislation.

Updated: 8:52 AM Apr 21, 2011

Marin urges governor to veto immigration legislation
A Gwinnett House member is calling on Gov. Nathan Deal to veto immigration legislation approved by the General Assembly last week.

Posted: 7:57 AM Apr 21, 2011
Reporter: Camie Young
Email Address: camie.young@gwinnettdailypost.com

width:161 and height: 240 and picwidth: 161 and pciheight: 240
Font Size:

DULUTH — A Gwinnett House member is calling on Gov. Nathan Deal to veto immigration legislation approved by the General Assembly last week.

State Rep. Pedro Marin, D-Duluth, who was one of the first Hispanic legislators elected to the General Assembly, sent a letter to Deal Thursday about House Bill 87, which mirrors a controversial Arizona law that gives the state the ability to enforce immigration law.

Marin wrote that the bill could have significant impact to Georgia’s economy with possible boycotts, lawsuits, red tape, costs to local government and a loss of migrant labor on agriculture and other industries.

“By vetoing this legislation, you have the ability to keep our state safe from a tidal wave of economic damage that would surely come if HB 87 were to become law,” Marin wrote in his letter to Deal. “Governor, as you know, our economy and our state revenues are now slowly recovering from the severe downturn of the three previous fiscal years. Now is not the time to add to our state’s 10 percent unemployment rate by enacting legislation that would certainly create more economic problems for Georgia businesses, farmers and taxpayers that we cannot afford.”

Marin said he was also concerned that the legislation would subject legal citizens to racial profiling.

“Georgia is a better state than this,” Marin wrote.

Deal has said he would sign the bill into law.

April 21, 2011

4/21 – Washington Post – Some Ga. business owners fear immigration bill could drive away workers, shrink labor force – The Washington Post

Some Ga. business owners fear immigration bill could drive away workers, shrink labor force – The Washington Post

ATLANTA — Some Georgia business owners and farmers say they could have a harder time finding workers because of a bill passed by lawmakers to crack down on illegal immigration — among the toughest in the nation.

Republican Gov. Nathan Deal has pledged to sign the bill, which would require employers to use a federal database to make sure new hires are in the country legally. It also would allow law enforcement to check the status of people being investigated, even during a traffic stop, if they don’t have an acceptable form of identification.

Business owners say the measure could make non-citizen workers reluctant to apply for jobs and make hiring new employees more expensive and cumbersome.

Atlanta chef Chris Hall, who said he relies on an immigrant workforce, opposes the bill in part because of fears his workers could be subject to racial profiling.

“My guy’s supposed to be here at 5, but if he’s pulled over for being brown in his car on the way here and he doesn’t get here until 6, that’s a problem,” said Hall, who co-owns Local Three restaurant. “A lot of us wonder, if you start taking away parts of our labor force, can we replace that?”

Hall, who said he follows federal requirements to ensure his employees are in the country legally, said that in 10 years of working in restaurants he hasn’t seen a U.S. citizen apply for a dishwashing job.

Civil liberties and immigrant rights groups, as well as some Democratic lawmakers, have also raised concerns that possible racial profiling and strict hiring rules could cause both legal and illegal immigrants to leave the state, which they say would diminish the work force and hurt the state’s economy.

The bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Matt Ramsey, R-Peachtree City, has said illegal immigrants are a drain on the state’s resources. He and law enforcement officials dismissed fears of profiling.

“We’ve got to have probable cause to make a stop, probable cause that a criminal or traffic offense has occurred, and probable cause is based on probable cause, not the color of one’s skin,” said Terry Norris, executive director of the Georgia Sheriff’s Association.

The law — which has provisions similar to a crackdown passed in Arizona last year that led to protests and court fights — would allow officers to detain an illegal immigrant, though it’s unlikely cash-strapped local jails will keep people in custody if they haven’t been charged with a crime and won’t be taken into custody by federal authorities, Norris said.

And officers won’t necessarily check immigration status in every instance because they are authorized — but not required — to do so, meaning departments can craft policies that fit their communities, said Frank V. Rotondo, executive director of the Georgia Association of Chiefs of Police.

He said some amount of instruction will likely be necessary for officers in the course of ongoing training.

“We don’t want to have a young, zealous officer attempting to enforce the law in a way he believes is correct and ending up doing something wrong,” he said.

Meanwhile, farmers and others are worried about using the free federal database, E-Verify, to make sure new hires are in the U.S. legally. By July 1, 2013, all companies with more than 10 workers will have to use the system.

Aaron McWhorter of Whitesburg, about 45 miles southwest of Atlanta, already uses E-Verify for his construction company because it has public contracts, but he’s loathe to implement it at his sod farm, he said.

“It’s not difficult to use,” he said. “But the process is kind of time-consuming and protracted because you can’t prescreen people with it.”

E-Verify can only be used once someone is hired. McWhorter said he has had instances in which he put people on payroll and started training them, only to find out the database indicated they were not eligible to work. In some cases it was a mistake because of a misspelled name or other error. But if it’s not, McWhorter said he’s wasted time and money training someone he has to fire.

“Down the road, I see a shortage of labor,” McWhorter said.

Supporters of the bill have said farmers and others can bring in unlimited seasonal workers through a federal guest worker program. However, Bill Brim, a vegetable farmer near Tifton about 180 miles south of Atlanta, said it already costs him time and money to bring in 477 workers using that H-2A visa program. Having to use E-Verify for those workers and the other roughly 200 workers he hires locally will cost him even more.

“We’ll have to hire somebody else to help implement the program,” he said. “It’s going to cost us money and already with H-2A we’re spending so much money on domestic workers and H-2A workers because of all the stuff we have to do.”

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 75 other followers

%d bloggers like this: